Hi ,
I required Basic VMware Test plan cases . Please refer some important VMware test cases
Regards
Bala
Hey Bala, there are many test cases - help us narrow down what you need...
Of course, you may already have a list of the above and details of how you would test a physical OS installation like Microsoft Windows 2008, and you are looking for similar steps?
Please provide more detail.
Thanks
Steve
Steve,
your comment cleared my doubts. Previously I was only administrating the ESX servers and VM in production environment. Recently my role changed to Designing the VMware according to customer needs.
Now I have one client requirement that I have designed it. next steps i will be build and testing based on my design. so I needs to produce doucment all the Build and test plan.
I have doubts what are all the test cases I can include my documentation.
Design scenario:
1. Standalone ESX server only HA
2. Clustered ESX server -- HA +VMotion+DRS
Test cases I prefer what you mentioned. But I want to classify what are all the necessary test required for the above design scenario.do you have any standard template for consolidating
test case so that I can use for document purpose.
Regards
Bala
Let's see if I understand: you want to test that your design is fit for purpose? Example: You have designed and built a cluster, now you want to test that HA works, etc.
OK, that's pretty straight-forward. I have a document on one of my other systems but can't get that until tomorrow. Until then, here's how I would approach this:
* Make sure that the design includes targets to test against. For example, if you have designed and built HA, then under what conditions will it provide high-availability (e.g. host only? or host and VM?), what are the conditions to trigger a failover (e.g. pull a network cable out), what alerts should be triggered and received, what is the expected recovery scenario, what are the actions required, how do you return to normal / close the test. In summary:
1 - Conditions - set the test conditions before you start
2 - Triggers - what are the trigger events (these are the events that would happen in "normal" production, and the ones you will pretend / mimic in test - like a network fail).
3 - Alerts - what events should you see, and where, and by whom?
4 - Actions - what actions are required by Support staff?
5 - Recovery - what is the recovery procedure
If you apply the same approach across all components of the system, you have a good test plan. Here is a rough list of components to test:
There are many more, but you get my drift... perhaps we should collaborate on writing this up into a proven practice on VIOPS?
Thanks
Steve
I am a little late to the party, but I would galdly "collaborate on writing this up into a proven practice". Let me know how I can contribute and we can get started.
Hi David, I propose the following... what do you think...
1) You (or someone else) creates the document in the Management zone. That takes about 90 seconds, instructions are here: How to create a proven practice document
(I could create the doc, but then I would be noted as the Author and I'm fed up of seeing my name everywhere!)
2) We fill in the metadata/headings (explained in the "How to" document above) and then write up a bulleted list of headings / outline of the content.
3) Then we post a discussion thread / invite people to comment and contribute, and fill in the blanks.
Building the document over time works really well and is a method I've used before a few times. That way, you can put in what you need without feeling you have to write the whole thing.
Why don't you make a start with creating the doc, filling in the headers and the outline as above, or whatever you think the outline should be, then click "Submit for Approval" and we'll take it from there.
Once the doc is in decent shape we'll promote it via blogs and on VMTN and other websites.
Cheers!
Steve
Hi all - Happy New year !! Has there been any follow-up in regards to developing this document?
Chuck
Hi Bala
One other thing to add to the test case if only as a consideration and you may have done this already is the dare I say it (knowing who I work for) the redundancy and sacalbility of the back end storage.
One of the things we always emphasize in our design phase is the flexibility that VMware offers in terms of protocol choice but also potenatially the issues this also creates around catering for and designing in redundancy.
For example if your VI infrastrucutre is being enabled by fibre channel - do you have a dual storage controller (or in EMC terms Storage Processor) Architecture that will allow you to test the failure of a link, HBA or storage controller and the implications of this - i.e whether the customer will want to pay for single dual or quad Fibre Channel cards / dual storage controller / dual fabric switch appraoch to optimise performance and redundancy vs. cost.
Alternatively if the chosen protocol is for example NFS, is there a consideration for the number of IP links from the host to the NFS export via the number of bonded NICs within the ESX host as well as the implementation of some form of 'Fail Safe Networking' or etherchannel linking the ESX host to the NFS export to ensure the failure of a single IP link will not halt operations
All too often and it is understandeable that is it this way, testing around ESX infrastructures focuses on the important features that VMware enables such as HA and DRS without necessarily extending the logic to ensuring the basis for the operation of those features - robust and redundant networks and storage - have also been considered and tested to ensure that the client is confident with the overall level of resiliency offered by the proposed design
Many thanks
Alex Tanner
I appoligize for the delay, but got sidetrack on some other projects. Hopefully will post what I have today.
My name is Aslam Mohammed, I would like to see the Testpan documentation for Vmotio, Nic teaming DRS etc ...
Here is a link to the document draft. Please feel free to respond with any changes. Will continue to add cases as time allows. There is a draft awaiting approval but feel free to comment on anything.
I thought that doc was published now... i can see it on the front page... let me know if something has broken :)
Copyright © 2008 VMware, Inc. All rights reserved.

