<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Applications : Proven Practice: Symantec eVault : Comments</title>
    <link>http://viops.vmware.com/home/docs/DOC-1513#comments</link>
    <description>Comments on : Proven Practice: Symantec eVault</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.0.8 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-16T21:25:31Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Proven Practice: Symantec eVault</title>
      <link>http://viops.vmware.com/home/docs/DOC-1513#comments-1736</link>
      <description>&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tim,  it sounds like there was no difference between installing eVault on VM vs physical hardware.  Were there any issues with Symantec support or any other things that might have been different due to VM's.  What kind of backup are you using for this app and is there any kind of DR or HA considerations?   Again, I guess the good news here is that from an application perspective, eVault knows nothing about VM's!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One other thing, I think you talked about doing this in preparation for a migration to Exchange 2007.   Why not add that to the piece so folks understand your motivation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks, &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bob Stephens&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>stephens</author>
      <guid>http://viops.vmware.com/home/docs/DOC-1513#comments-1736</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-16T21:25:31Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Proven Practice: Symantec eVault</title>
      <link>http://viops.vmware.com/home/docs/DOC-1513#comments-1737</link>
      <description>&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, any comments on what the underlying host hardware looks like or is it also irrelevant?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:28:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>stephens</author>
      <guid>http://viops.vmware.com/home/docs/DOC-1513#comments-1737</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-16T21:28:16Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

